Blog

What’s on our minds

We share what we learn and what we’re doing so that others can learn from us and we can learn from others. Comments welcome!

Learning from COVID-19 grassroots leaders: What we can do (part 2 of 2)

Six hands holding each other in a circle

We talked to grassroots leaders in COVID-19 to understand what support would help them. This is what we take away.

You can see an overview of the research on the study’s project page. Read the full report to get all the details of how we conducted the study, who the participants were, evidence for our findings, along with our takeaways and recommendations.

Our goal was to  understand  how we might expand our services to support Spontaneous Leaders — people who emerge as leaders in situations of ambiguous leadership — during a crisis.

You can read a brief summary of our findings here. These are our takeaways.

What we can do

First and foremost, continue with the CCL mission!

Second, help SLs to understand and succeed in a daunting and unfamiliar journey,

  • Develop educational materials that foster appreciation of SLs and that offer SLs inspiration, practical advice, and emotional encouragement. See, for example, “Advice from the frontlines” on our Leaders page.
  • Spread the skills and mindsets needed to start and run a successful grassroots crisis response effort.
  • Guide SLs through the common journey of a grassroots crisis response — from ideation to stabilization – using the principles of Design and Entrepreneurial Thinking.

Third, finding and connecting with SLs to offer them support in the midst of a crisis poses a substantial challenge. They are busy with the needs of their response effort, don’t self-identify as leaders, and, often, both!

  • Rather than attempting to market services directly to SLs, it may be more effective to rely on local communities and response organizations for referrals to CCL’s materials and services.
  • CCL should leverage the training program to promote awareness of the value of Spontaneous Leaders and grassroots crisis efforts.

Fourth, CCL could provide or foster specific services of value to SLs. Most notably, help them,

  • Develop situational understanding and knowledge, especially understanding of crisis response practices and the resources that may be available.
  • Identify and develop connections to their broader community and support networks.
  • Operate in ways that foster legitimacy and credibility, so they can win the trust of those they seek to help, and those from whom they seek help.
  • Identify and find the professional services that they might need, e.g., legal, financial, marketing, and personal mental wellness services.

Finally, tailor service and materials delivery to accommodate the vastly differing needs and attentional resources of individual SLs. For example, provide materials and services in differing modes requiring varying levels of commitment,

  • Quick hit guidance consumable in minutes, such as simple one-page infographics and checklists.
  • In-depth materials consumable in sporadic bursts, such as a highly-curated, easily-navigated library of resources and references.
  • Ongoing support, such as peer support from other, possibly more experienced, SLs, expert mentors or coaching.

In conclusion

We have our work cut out for us!

 

Read more about the findings
Read the full report

Learning from COVID-19 grassroots leaders: What we found (part 1 of 2)

"Reaching out" by andrew and hobbes is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0

At the start of the pandemic, we talked to 11 fascinating individuals about COVID-19 grassroots responses. Here’s what we learned.

You can see an overview of the research on the study’s project page. Read the full report to get all the details of how we conducted the study, who the participants were, evidence for our findings, along with our takeaways and recommendations.

Our goal was to understand  how we might expand our services to support Spontaneous Leaders — people who emerge as leaders in situations of ambiguous leadership — during a crisis.

This blog is a brief summary of our findings. Our takeaways will be described in another blog.

Our first finding – an affirmation of CCL’s mission!

Our first finding confirms that SLs emerged in response to COVID-19 and are likely to do so in other crises. It also affirms that starting a grassroots response is emotionally and logistically difficult, and that SLs would benefit from the kind of training and empowerment support services that align with CCL’s mission – spreading the skills and mindset necessary for collective action and improvised leadership.

The study revealed a critical need to tailor service delivery to the needs and attentional resources of individual SLs – the SLs interviewed exhibited substantial variety in backgrounds, skill sets, and bandwidth for taking in new information.

The study also underscored the difficulty of identifying and reaching SLs in the midst of a crisis. This suggests that spreading awareness of the role and importance of SLs to crisis response, prior to a crisis, is essential to successful delivery of prospective CCL services.

The rest of the findings – What support do SLs need?

The rest of the findings describe the support that SLs need.

  1. The SL journey is difficult and fraught with obstacles. Guidance along the journey would be highly valuable to maintaining motivation and momentum. Interestingly, and maybe unsurprising to some of our readers, the SL experience bears striking resemblance to that described by Design and Entrepreneurial Thinking.
  2. An SL’s  effectiveness is strongly correlated with their situational awareness – their understanding of the larger situation they’re working within. This includes understanding what resources might be available, knowing what those they are helping need,  what social, logistical and economic forces are at play. Unfortunately, SLs’ ability to understand the situation is often hampered because they are overwhelmed and operating in unfamiliar waters.
  3. In COVID-19, most SL efforts were focused on “brokering the last mile” — getting available resources to the individuals that need them. Grassroots efforts are often instrumental in filling local gaps, providing detailed knowledge of local conditions and community members.
  4. Networks and relationships are critical to an SL’s success. Social connections are invaluable in overcoming issues of awareness and trust. SLs especially rely on connections forged before the disaster happens, but also need to be able to develop new ones quickly during a crisis.
  5. SLs must have the trust of the community they serve and the resource providers they need. Without legitimacy and credibility, SLs struggle to maintain the connections needed to succeed.
  6. Eventually, most SLs need some form of professional advice or help, most commonly, legal counsel, accounting and tax support, fundraising and marketing expertise, insurance coverage, and even mental wellness support. Unfortunately, SLs may not recognize their need for professional help or have the wherewithal to obtain it, complicating their journey and possibly placing them at personal risk.

In conclusion

CCL is on the right track! These findings give us heart that SLs are out there and they need our help. Furthermore, the findings provide insight into what kinds of support would be of value to the SLs.

 

Read about possible support services in this blog
Read the full report

Our COVID-19 research report is out!!!

At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we set out to learn how we might expand our programs to help those who are helping others.

Here is our report!

We extend our deepest appreciation to

  • Garett Dworman for generously volunteering his time and skills to conduct interviews, analyze data, and write the report,
  • Zach Pipkin of Tableau Software for his copious help with recruiting and data analysis, and
  • Malina Cheeneebash for her invaluable support with finding and vetting leads, and with data analysis.

Special thanks to Amy Alberts and the User Research team at Tableau Software for their extensive support with research planning, identifying leads, recruiting, and scheduling participants, especially Britta Fiore-Gartland, Eden Heller, Erin Bartuska, and Melanie Tory.

Our gratitude to Meghan Ede, and General Assembly graduates Adriana Orland, Hannah Feldman, and Victoria Zhambalova for their support with research planning and recruiting efforts.

Finally, our heartfelt gratitude to our study participants for giving us their time, and for giving of themselves to help others get through the COVID-19 pandemic.


This study is dedicated to the
Spontaneous Leaders who try, including those who fail.

They accomplish more than you think.


Storyboard, storyboard, storyboard!

We aim to learn from everything we do. That was certainly true of our recent video project.

Collectively, we have a wide variety of experience in design, education, performing arts, and video production. But this was the first time we, as a team, set out to create a video from scratch.

We’re proud of the result, but have some ideas about what we want to do differently next time.

The Process

The video came about because we decided to experiment with delivering learning experiences virtually. In talking about a pilot event, we realized that it would be easy to capture video of just about everything. That led to deciding to create a promotional video.

So, we recorded everything that was happening on Zoom during the event, and asked participants to record what they were doing on their phones. Then we used otter.ai to transcribe the resulting video recordings so we could pick out the “good” bits more easily.

The amazing Peter Cromwell did an fantastic job putting together a first cut. After two revisions, based on comments from our internal team, we sent it to a small group of “friendlies” for review.

Their reactions were highly favorable, but their feedback all had one thing in common: There isn’t enough context to help the viewer understand what the video is about.

Fixing that was not as simple as it might seem. We could re-conceive the piece entirely, and change the structure we had. Or we could add clarifying materials, and call it good enough. In the end, we opted for the latter, and collected learning opportunities.

The Learning Opportunities

First off, we did several things right:

  • Capturing video materials was, to begin with, a great idea. Having participants record their activities was even better.
  • Getting all the videos transcribed immediately was a huge time-saver, and really helped in identifying pieces that connected to each other.
  • Making sure someone with professional skills was doing the editing was absolutely the right thing. (Even if we may have driven Peter crazy.)

But we also uncovered an important lesson:

  • It’s about the story. We defined our goals and objectives for the video early on. But we didn’t have a vision for what story it should tell, thinking that the story would emerge from the materials we collected. It turns out you need a clear storyline to bridge the gulf between knowing what the story is about and good visual materials. In hindsight, we should have storyboarded a general storyline, even before the event.

As a consequence of not having a story vision, we left it up to Peter to create one. We were lucky. He did a great job. But, on the next one, we will have the team walk through the “good” bits of visual material together to see how they fit into the initial storyboard, and adjust the story. That would probably yield a stronger result, and save a round or two of revisions.

In other words, next time, we storyboard from the beginning!

The Result

Special thanks to Larry Mirkin of Mirkin Creative for helping us to understand this learning opportunity.

Ready, Set, Earthquake!

We are very proud to announce the release of our first video, Ready, Set, Earthquake! This short promotional piece shows how our training events work, and illustrates the benefits of combining discovery-based learning and live-action roleplay.

It came about, in part, because of a small grant from International Paper that we received with our partner, The Game Academy.

We were working on a short demo experience to give prospective community partners a sense of the emotional and intellectual engagement of our learning experiences. That plan was stalled by COVID-19, when we turned our attention to understanding what support spontaneous leaders in an actual crisis need.

When we got back to our training program, the funds were still available. Aaron Vanek had the brilliant idea of using the grant for a virtual pilot event, and then creating a promotional video to serve our demo needs.

This is the result. Please let us know what you think.